Reconstruction of the Principle of Legality in Law Number 1 of 2023: An Analysis of the Extension of Living Law in Society and Its Implications for Legal Certainty

Penulis

  • Indah Cahya Purnama Faculty of Law University of Bengkulu
  • Herlita Eryke Faculty of Law University of Bengkulu

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33751/palar.v12i2.57

Abstrak

This study examines the effect of the application of living law on legal certainty in Indonesia's criminal justice system after the enactment of Law Number 1 of 2023. The analysis is based on 412 court decisions from 2022 to 2025, comparing conditions before and after the reform . The findings show a significant increase in the intensity of living law application, reflected in higher references to local norms, stronger sociological reasoning, and greater influence on judicial decisions. At the same time, legal certainty declined, as indicated by reduced decision consistency, increased judging disparity, and higher rates of legal appeals . Regression results confirm that all indicators of living law application have a negative and significant effect on legal certainty. The strongest effect comes from the influence of living law on judicial decisions, followed by sociological reasoning and references to local norms . This study provides an empirical contribution to the literature on legal pluralism and criminal law reform by demonstrating how the expansion of non-written norms affects judicial consistency. The findings highlight the need for clear interpretative guidelines to ensure balance between flexibility and legal certainty.

 

Keywords : Living law, legal certainty, criminal justice, sentencing disparity.

Referensi

A. Hamzah, Principles of Criminal Law in Indonesia , Jakarta: Rineka Cipta, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Asas-Asas+Hukum+Pidana+Andi+Hamzah+2022

A. Peters, “Legal Certainty Revisited,” German Law Journal , vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 641–660, 2020.

B. Arief, Development of the Indonesian Criminal Law System , Jakarta: Kencana, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Perkembangan+Sistem+Hukum+Pidana+Indonesia+Barda+Nawawi+Arief

D. Bedner, "Indonesian Legal Pluralism and the Recognition of Customary Law," Journal of Legal Pluralism , vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 215–230, 2020.

FS Susanti, “Legal Certainty in the Reform of the National Criminal Code,” Jurnal Rechts Vinding , vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 345–360, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://rechtsvinding.bphn.go.id

J. Light, “Sentencing Disparities and Judicial Consistency,” Journal of Empirical Legal Studies , vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 890–915, 2021.

M. Ali, “Judicial Discretion and Legal Certainty in Criminal Cases,” Jurnal Yudisial , vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 1–15, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://jurnal.komisiyudisial.go.id/index.php/jy/article/view/

M. Crouch, “Law Reform and Judicial Reform in Indonesia,” Law & Policy , vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 3–25, 2021.

Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia, Supreme Court Annual Report 2024 , Jakarta, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.mahkamahagung.go.id

R. Michaels, “Global Legal Pluralism,” Annual Review of Law and Social Science , vol. 18, pp. 245–263, 2022.

S. Butt and T. Lindsey, “Judicial Discretion and Legal Certainty in Indonesia,” Asian Journal of Comparative Law , vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 145–168, 2022.

S. Irianto, “Legal Pluralism in the National Legal System,” Journal of Law & Development , vol. 51, no. 2, pp. 210–225, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://jhp.ui.ac.id/index.php/home/article/view/

T. Ginsburg and M. Versteeg, “The Boundaries of Legal Reform,” International Journal of Constitutional Law , vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 687–713, 2020.

Diterbitkan

2026-04-05

Cara Mengutip

Indah Cahya Purnama, & Herlita Eryke. (2026). Reconstruction of the Principle of Legality in Law Number 1 of 2023: An Analysis of the Extension of Living Law in Society and Its Implications for Legal Certainty. PALAR (Pakuan Law Review), 12(2), 17–25. https://doi.org/10.33751/palar.v12i2.57