Reconstruction Of State Administrative Law In Order To Realize Good Governance And Inclusive Public Services
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33751/palar.v12i3.165Abstrak
This research explores the reconstruction of state administrative law as a strategic effort to realize good governance and inclusive public services in Indonesia. Using a qualitative normative juridical approach, the study analyzes the weaknesses of existing administrative legal frameworks that remain dominated by bureaucratic rigidity, hierarchical structures, and limited public participation. The findings reveal a significant gap between legal norms and their implementation, leading to inefficiencies, weak accountability, and unequal access to services. To address these challenges, the research proposes a reconstructed model of state administrative law founded on three key dimensions: normative, institutional, and inclusive. The normative dimension integrates transparency, accountability, and participation as binding legal norms; the institutional dimension restructures administrative systems for better coordination and oversight; and the inclusive dimension ensures equality and accessibility in service delivery. The study concludes that legal reconstruction is essential to transform administrative law from a static regulatory framework into a dynamic instrument of justice and social welfare. This reconstruction strengthens Indonesia’s democratic foundation, enhances citizen trust, and fulfills the constitutional vision of social justice for all the people of Indonesia.
Keywords: Administrative Law, Good Governance, Inclusive Public Services.
Referensi
Azam, Malul, and Geert Bouckaert. “The Narrative Path of Indonesian Public Sector Reforms 1998–2023.” Developments in Administration 6, no. 1 (2025): 17–41.
Faleiros, Moura. “Electronic, Performance and Digital Government: Which Is the Better Conceptual Model for Public Administration in the 21st Century?” Brazilian Journal of Law, Technology and Innovation 3, no. 2 (2025).
Gustafsson, Mariana, Olga Matveieva, Elin Wihlborg, Yevgeniy Borodin, Tetiana Mamatova, and Sergiy Kvitka. “Adaptive Governance amidst the War: Overcoming Challenges and Strengthening Collaborative Digital Service Provision in Ukraine.” Government Information Quarterly 42 (2025).
Hikmal, Andi, Hadin Muhjad, Trisna Agus Brata, Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum, and Sultan Adam. “Synchronization of Legislation on Narcotics Abuse by Civil Servants from the Perspective of General Principles of Good Governance.” Journal of Scientific, Research, Education, and Technology 4, no. 1 (2025): 329–60.
Hussain, Tanveer. “Market Thinking in Public Service: Designing Statutory Authorities for Governance and Efficiency.” Contemporary Journal of Social Science Review 3, no. 4 (2025): 81–93.
Imoh, Emmanuel Uchenna, and Michael C. N. Ihemadu. “Challenges and Prospects of Local Government Administration in Nigeria: Lessons from Imo State.” African Journal of Social and Behavioural Sciences 15, no. 4 (2025): 1697–1713.
Jacob, Jonathan, Paul Latupeirissa, Ni Luh Yulyana Dewi, I Kadek Rian Prayana, and Melati Budi Srikandi. “Transforming Public Service Delivery: A Comprehensive Review of Digitization Initiatives.” Sustainability 16 (2024).
Johannes, Fillemon Nadhipite, and Chris Hendriks. “Corporate Governance Implementation: A Key Instrument for Effective Administration and Management of State-Owned Enterprises—A Scoping Review.” Frontiers in Political Science 3 (2025). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpos.2025.1511708.
Juneja, Ritika. “An Analysis of the Role of Administrative Law in Good Governance.” International Journal of All Research Education and Scientific Methods 12, no. 1 (2024): 1251–55.
Licsandru, Tana. “Citizens’ Inclusion in Public Services: A Systematic Review of the Public Administration Literature and Reflection on Future Research Avenues.” Public Administration (2025): 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.13049.
Renggani, Fira Putri, Muhamad Husein Maruapey, Aulia Armelitta, and Nur Santi. “Analysis of PT. Pertamina Corruption Case in the Perspective of Public Administration Ethics.” International Journal of Applied Research and Sustainable Sciences 3, no. 6 (2025): 533–42.
Safdar, Muhammad Rizwan. “Institutional Reform Through Authority Models: Rethinking Corporate Governance in Pakistan’s Public Sector.” Contemporary Journal of Social Science Review 3, no. 1 (2025): 2446–58.
Swasthaisong, Sanyasorn, Thipaporn Klawklong, Sasinan Toochaleesrithin, and Ratchadaphorn Thirawan. “Transforming the Public Sector for a Just and Sustainable Society and Future Trends.” Journal of Public and Private Issues: JPPI 1 (2025): 1–15.
Timikoru, Fakumo. “Good Governance and Sustainable Development in Africa: A Study of Governance in Nigeria.” Journal of Political Science and Leadership Research 11, no. 4 (2025): 121–35. https://doi.org/10.56201/jpslr.vol.11.no4.2025.pg121.135.
Ullah, Hafiz Ahmed, and Nosheen Rana. “Governance Challenges and Democratic Instability in Pakistan: An Islamic Perspective on Justice, Accountability, and Sustainable Development.” International Research Journal of Arts, Humanities and Social Sciences 2, no. 2 (2025): 538–51.
Wahab, Abdul. “Public Policy Formulation with Justice: Administrative Law Perspective.” International Journal of Scientific Research 2, no. 1 (2025): 17–25. https://doi.org/10.62894/a.
Zabidi, Nadirah, Mohd Mahadee Ismail, Zatul Himmah Adnan, Mohd Izani, and Mohd Zain. “Good Governance Practices for Sustainable Development in the Public Sector Services in Malaysia.” Akademika 94, no. 2 (2024): 252–66.
Unduhan
Diterbitkan
Cara Mengutip
Terbitan
Bagian
Lisensi
Hak Cipta (c) 2026 PALAR | PAKUAN LAW REVIEW
Artikel ini berlisensiCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Jurnal Pakuan Law review based on the provisions Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. / CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 this license requires that you provide appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if any changes have been made. You may do so in any reasonable way, but not in any way that would imply that the licensor endorses you or your use. this license shall not use the material for commercial purposes. this license permits Share Alike If you mix, modify, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original. No additional restrictions. You may not apply legal provisions or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
.png alt=)
